Friday, July 24, 2015

July 24, 2015: The Tate Britain’s "Late Turner: Painting Set Free" exhibition at the DeYoung Museum, San Francisco

I was privileged to view this exhibition this morning, and I came away quite emotionally affected.

You can find a virtually definitive review of the exhibition, organized by the Tate Gallery of London, by Richard Dorment of the London Daily Telegraph at


Dorment is not a sentimental reviewer.  He casts a cold eye on the physical infirmities that beset the artist in the last 16 years of his life, the period from which the works shown were painted.  After reading Dorment's catalog of those infirmities and the deficiencies in various of the works they must have caused, I cannot change the reaction I had when exiting the show.  Turner was already rich and famous, and he continued to paint the same subjects that he had always portrayed.  Dorment says that the last three works in the exhibition - showy, bravado pieces based on stories of Aeneas and Dido were insincere theater.  Dorment says "They are dreadfully overworked, and overcrowded to the point of incoherence. Yet Turner exhibited them at the Royal Academy in 1850, implying that these were kinds of pictures by which he wished to be judged, not those light filled washes of colour we all love, which may, after all, simply be unfinished."

Well, maybe and notwithstanding, I loved the paintings, and I came away with the same feelings I had when many years ago when I saw a show of Matisse's cut-outs done when his hands were so arthritic that he could barely hold a scissors.  I was wet-eyed after the Matisse and in awe of the sheer dedication to art and his never-give-up production in the face of great pain.  I did not well-up today, but I emerged with a strong feeling for the guts and fervor shown by Turner, this sick and pained artist, until the very end.

If you admire heroism against great odds, see the show while it's still up.  The visual delights are an extra gift.

Friday, July 3, 2015

July 3, 2015: the "Greek debt" situation

The “Greek debt” situation as of July 3, 2015:
Greece: Prime Minister Urges 'No' Vote In Referendum  -  Stratfor
July 3, 2015 | 14:46 GMT

Greece's prime minister has urged voters to reject what he called "blackmail" and vote "No" when they cast their ballots in a referendum on Greece's bailout on July 5, BBC reported July 3.  In a television address, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said Greece's Eurozone membership is not at stake, though EU leaders have said a "No" vote could lead to Greece's exit from the monetary bloc.  Moreover, EU politicians have staunchly denied Greece's claims that a "No" vote on the referendum would strengthen Athens' position in bailout negotiations. Even if Greece and its creditors reach an agreement, 
the referendum battle has made Greece's Eurozone membership more precarious


July 3, 2015 – Marc Chandler writing for Seeking Alpha

Polls for the Greek referendum suggest a statistical tie. The polls also show the vast majority of Greeks want to remain within monetary union.  Syriza is campaigning hard to for a "no" vote to reject the official creditors demands.  Ironically, there have been several defections from its far-right junior coalition partner favoring the a "yes" vote.  Syriza officials have tried playing down the momentous nature of the referendum, suggesting that a deal will be worked out immediately following the referendum.   Varoufakis has claimed that an agreement has been reached on everything but debt relief, and that a no vote would secure this.  This does not ring true and strikes me as an effort to encourage a "no" vote, by suggesting that the implications will not be so severe.  As we have noted, the official creditors have offered debt relief in the past, predicated on Greece achieving certain austerity goals. A "no" vote will not move this higher on the agenda, though a "yes" vote which sees the current government collapse could see more details in an agreement with a new government.  While many observers are focused on the sovereign debt obligation to the ECB in late July, my concern is the current situation cannot persist that long.   Clearly on a "no" vote, at its Monday meeting the ECB cannot increase the ELA borrowings.  However, it is not clear that they can on a "yes" vote.  Greek banks were already teetering on insolvency and that ongoing deposit flight, albeit slower, and the further erosion of the economy, pushes them over the edge.  The rating agency Fitch has opined that the four largest Greek banks would have already failed if not for the ELA. The Emergency Liquidity Assistance is not to prop up insolvent banks, but to help those faced with a liquidity challenge.

PTOLEMY’S THOUGHTS ON THE GENERAL SITUATION:

1.     Adoption of the common currency is like sports:  It doesn’t make character; it reveals it.

2.     Speculation as to whether the creation of the Eurozone was wise or whether Greece should have been included in the first place is vain and irrelevant.  I think that the European elites (the wealthy and the technocrats) wanted it to enrich themselves and to increase their relative power.   Notwithstanding the gloss of certain historically minded commentators, there is no irresistible and inevitable Hegelian movement toward a unified Europe.  The creation of the Eurozone at this point appears as a power grab favoring the elites.  The Greek issues are only the latest skirmish in maintaining the privileges of the European elites – that’s what “austerity” is.  Its goal is to keep the lower classes in their place.  Syriza has that right to that extent.

3.     The Greeks had to be included in the Eurozone as customers and clients.  The Greeks had to accept because they needed the wealth transfers (i.e., EU funding for the Olympic Village, the sumptuous subway, the world class airport and the freeways that access the airport).  All too human, the Greeks were tired of being poor.  As of a year or so ago they boasted the highest per capita auto ownership in the world.   Sadly, will was lacking to change course on a bloated bureaucracy and a much too extravagant pension regime – dependency was endemic - or to launch industries where an Adam Smith advantage might be identified.

4.     Ptolemy has cribbed from Stratfor a brief history of how Greece got into this predicament as follows:

  “[Greece] is struggling under public debt levels of 177 percent of gross domestic product, while private domestic debt stands at about 122 percent. In 1980, those two figures were 22.6 percent and 37.4 percent respectively, and these differences are made even starker by the knowledge that the Greek economy has grown 20 percent in the intervening years. In fact, in 2008 it was 56 percent larger than in 1980, but has since shrunk back.

“Greek public debt has grown consistently since 1980. In the wake of the oil crises of the 1970s, which hurt all oil-importing countries, the Greek Socialist government turned to public debt markets as a solution to its woes. By the 1990s Greek public debt stood at 100 percent of GDP. It remained there until the turn of the century, when Greece took the decisive step of entering the eurozone. Private debt, meanwhile, was fairly stable: In 1980, it was 37.4 percent of GDP, and in 1999 the figure was still just 38.8 percent.

“Entry into the Eurozone in January 2001 changed Greece's position completely. The common currency caused Greek interest rates to fall from 10-18 percent in the 1990s to just 2-3 percent, as Greece benefitted from the market perception that being tied to the powerful German economy guaranteed Greek solvency.

“The global financial crisis brought Greece's flimsy house of cards crashing down. As in several economies in Europe, the slowdown led to a massive increase in public debt as the government stepped in to keep the economy alive through public spending. Government deficits rose to 10 percent in 2009 and then to 15 percent in 2010. Government debt likewise ballooned, with the burden increased by the fact that GDP was also shrinking swiftly. Even though the Greek case is an extreme example, the same story — private indebtedness soaring through the eurozone's first decade and ultimately being transferred into giant public debts — was a direct result of the creation of the monetary union. Similar examples can be found across the Continent, in places such as Spain, Portugal, Ireland, and Italy.”

5.     Even before the Eurozone, the Germans had to lend throughout the Eurozone without regard to whether the poorer nations could repay in order to maintain their exports and low unemployment.  The SPD has continued to be intellectually bankrupt.  The CDU’s only goal and function is to preserve the ongoing value of German pensions.  Germany operates under a tenuous alliance:  the corporations have a free hand to operate at home and abroad as they will and with a very low unit labor cost, provided they then pay generous portions of high profits into the welfare system.  The system cannot operate unless the poorer Eurozone countries are systematically exploited.

6.     Since 2002 the ascendancy of the Asian economies and “globalization” have intervened.  The stagnation and relative decrease of net worth of the European continent have been exposed.  The economic competitiveness of the poorer Eurozone nations has continued to decline.  Looking beyond past historical borrowing and repayment issues, the problem generally is the continually decreasing standard of living of large areas of Europe and the economic decline of France, Italy, Spain and Portugal.   Greece is only the most obvious symptom of this malaise.  Greece would be in decline had it never borrowed.

7.     The goals of “austerity” and re-tooling to meet the challenges of Asian and U.S. ascendancy are contradictory.  Carefully targeted austerity has aided the economy of the U.K.  This is not the venue to discuss what the lack of austerity has done to the U.S. economy.  But if a nation or region inflates, and unit labor costs increase, the privileges of the elites are put in motion and possibly jeopardized.  Europe’s class system has a big problem with that.

8.     Syriza understands that the present conflicts – when one gets past the old-fashioned notion that borrowed money ought to be repaid – are a continuation of nothing less than the class struggle that Marx first identified.  Wolfgang Schauble knows that, too, but he stays comfortably within his allegations of genetic Mediterranean profligacy.


9.      Whether Greece is ousted from the Eurozone or not, and no matter when, its economy will be suffering for years to come.  Greece was a poor country for most of its history, and it will be so again for the foreseeable future.

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Matthew Brannan's fascinating billboard project

Funny, intruiguing, possibly socially revealing:
Ptolemy

Matthew Brannon, 2015, billboard, The Manifest Destiny Billboard Project




MATTHEW BRANNON
CHAPTER #10: CERTAIN SNAKES

THE MANIFEST DESTINY BILLBOARD PROJECT
ON VIEW THROUGHOUT LOS ANGELES
LAND - Los Angeles Nomadic Division


Matthew Brannon’s series of billboards, entitled Certain Snakes, subverts the traditional strategies of advertisement commonly employed on billboards (scale of text, consistency of font, color, and motif). In each, he suggests the announcement for a new film, television show, or mini-series, while using absurd circuitous language for these non-existent works. At first glance, the content is camouflaged by the visual legitimacy of the scale and layout, though in attempting to decipher these ads, the viewer is thwarted: endless possibilities of interpretation can be generated. This approach is characteristic of Brannon’s work, which is often based upon literary theory and the confusion of advertising/design tropes.

As the final chapter of the two-year cross-country journey westward, Brannon’s billboards play on the disillusionment of hopes and dreams associated with heading west, particularly to Los Angeles. In reality, the fantasy of this city becomes evermore opaque and intangible.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Observations on the 2015 Venice Biennale


The 2015 Venice Biennale was, as usual, a mixed bag.  The German Pavilion was well done, but, like many of the exhibitions, it seemed more of a PR/propaganda tract than what we formerly, perhaps naively, referred to as "art," i.e., something largely divorced from current events - that being in itself a political statement by those rich and secure enough to be removed from the travails of the world.  The French Pavilion was a masterpiece of irrelevant, new age nonsense, and the British Pavilion by Sarah Lucas showed truncated female torsos with cigarettes emanating from their butts.  It was supposed to be about the victimization of women but ended up being tasteless misogyny.  Russia, Japan and Korea were interesting.  Swiss and Venezuela were puerile.  Spain and Belgium were shallowly fixed on the past (Dali as a source of modern Spanish critical thought - really? - and in the case of Belgium more tired and useless obsession with the Congo past).  Netherlands was flimsy, and what Okui Enwezor installed in the main pavilion was sullen and mostly bad art.  The U.S. appeared silly to us - some childish films by Joan Jonas, now 78, seemingly selected for sentimental value (another neglected woman artist).  We spent 60 seconds in the U.S. Pavilion.

The Arsenale was more interesting because many of the objects were very good artistically.  Still it was mostly about resurrecting morose middle aged artists who never fit into the commercial art world (the commercial milieu being so happy that one buys the works to become happy).  I think that many of the artists had been preciously overlooked, many of them African-Americans, because Enwezor thinks we wear blinders.  We do, but much of the art presented is simply not very good either.  The entire Biennale is some respects is a welcome antidote to the Christmas Tree consumerist optimism of much of the commercial gallery offerings, but much of it was stuck in what is now ancient history for the kids, i.e., the decolonization of Africa in the 1950’s and ’60’s and the present day plight of African "immigrants" in Europe.

In any event, we now realize that Dare and I throughout our collecting years were entirely creatures of the avant garde.  Our game was precociously finding new artists and trends which told of the actual present and were predictive of where the culture was headed.  We believed in and thought we perceived trends.  Now most of the art world declares the avant garde dead.  The last three Biennales were dedicated to finding overlooked artists from every nook and cranny of the world outside the main lanes of art commerce.  As far as we are concerned, whether because these artists were overlooked because they came from some obscure corner of the world or because they were out of phase with critical thought, most deserved to have been overlooked.  I am a Marxist, i.e., good art is always and exclusively an expression of the dominant economies/cultures, and Amazonians and Aborigines can't ever produce good art by definition.  We are bored stiff looking at the output of a blind hermit from upstate New York.  Of course, the avant garde is never dead, and there are geniuses out there who are mining the future.  Those who declare it dead, which constitutes about 98 percent of the art public, are just too backward to get it and need to justify their stupidity.


Enwezor is a very intelligent political hack and propagandist who knows what he is doing.  We knew him personally during his brief tenure in SF.   He once called me by name and knew me as a trouble-maker.  He has made his point very well, i.e., life is grim for the poor and colored, and the art world caters to the ignorant, removed rich.  We just wish that the "artworks" he selected to make his point were better art.  But, then, as Marx would have said, they can't be.

Friday, January 3, 2014

Dare and Themis's Dramatic Voyage from Venice to Dubai, November 10 through 19, 2013

DARE AND THEMIS’S DRAMATIC VOYAGE

TO VENICE AND ROME AND ON THE

GOOD SHIP NAUTICA TO THE

EMPIRES OF ANTIQUITY

*****


NOVEMBER 10 TO DECEMBER 9, 2013




The Nautica and an Arab Dhow

*****


San Francisco to Venice, November 10 and 11, 2013, Sunday and Monday



            The first leg of our wide-ranging cosmopolitan international tour began in ordinary mode with an American flight to Chicago.  We emerged in the Admiral’s Club to find ourselves inside the first of many provincialisms to come, the Bears-Lions game on TV, with about a hundred enthusiasts spellbound in hope and admiration.   E-mail updating and a Bloody Mary later, we embarked for Madrid on Iberia Airlines and found that the entire trip had placed us in business class from San Francisco to Venice.  The meal was so-so, but the seats were ample.

            Changing planes in Madrid is always a challenge because of the vastness of the place and the paucity of message boards.  It was now Monday, November 11.  We had no idea where to go next for the flight to Venice, but the immigration officer told us in authoritative tones to go to Gates J.  Just take the elevator straight ahead down one floor; it’s less than 35 minutes to your gate.   We took his word for it and went down the elevator and then up two long escalators to board a fast underground train.   Another escalator and we were in an enormous departure lounge with head-turning luxury shopping, coffee bars and rest rooms.  Spain may have financial difficulties, but it is broadly affluent.

            We breezed over the ancient western Mediterranean and in about two and a half hours landed at the Venice airport, bearing in mind of course that you’re not in Venice.  We decided to take the public water “bus” to town, which wasn’t exactly cheap, about 20 euro each, but we remembered that Europeans have this nasty habit of paying for public transportation what it costs, a practice unknown in American cities.  The embarkation point is always remembered as being around the corner, but it’s actually a twelve-minute walk from the terminal.  An hour or so later to disembarked at San Zaccaria, just east of San Marco, whereupon we acted upon a wild, and as it turned out seriously inaccurate, guess as to which opening in the facades of the buildings facing the water we should take to end up at the Liassidi Palace, our hotel in the Greek section, which is to say what had been the Greek merchants’ section three or four hundred years ago.

            I dimly remembered from our visit in November of 2011 that the hotel was a short distance northeast of San Marco.  The treachery of old Venice overtook us, however.  We should have taken the narrow lane that opens to the interior from the quay next to the venerable Hotel Danieli (forever in my memory as the place where Proust stayed during his visits to Venice), but alas we veered too far east, and the short walk to the hotel became a laborious loop requiring over half an hour, including a stop to seek out the aged desk clerk at an ancient Hotel Residenzia to ask for directions, all while dragging collectively about 120 pounds in baggage.  We had to pull the bags up and down over five or six of those infernal bridges over canals – structures of beauty and grace if one is unencumbered – until we finally arrived at the hotel.  There we found a comfortable room in a concerted, very old palazzo at a reasonable price.

           With ample daylight remaining, we walked to the Piazza San Marco along the waterfront.  We estimated that the number of tourists on this November day was about 40 percent of the number in the square on a summer’s day.  We realized that everything looked different when the area was relatively less crowded.   We saw details in and colors of the stones of the buildings that could not remember having seen before.  The spaces were larger.  The Cathedral was scaffolded on the outside, but the four horses over the entrance were in place, and the overall effect was grand.  We walked around the interior for half an hour, with almost no one inside.  The mosaics were brilliant, even in the dimming light.

            Before quitting the square, there was one final ceremony to be performed:  the ritual drink at Florian's, at one time or perhaps for all time one of the great cafes of the world.  It was November, and no string orchestra played at the entrance.  In 2001 we had attended a private party before a dinner in the Museo Correr at the south end of the square given by the Culture Ministry of France in honor of the French artist chosen to represent France in that year's Biennale, Jean Paul Bustamante, of whom someone in the Ministry found out that we had been modestly early collectors.  We downed three Bellinis each out on the square, behind exclusionary ropes, waiting, hoping and praying that someone we knew might pass by and see us at the private party.  Alas, no one came by.  On this occasion, we filed meekly into the interior tea rooms and quietly ordered cups of hot chocolate, it being too late for coffee.  Around us sat two middle-aged Japanese couples, heavily laden with cameras, and a rustic Canadian couple. Where had Marcello, Sophia, perhaps Grace Kelly, even D'Annunzio, Pound or Proust gone?  No matter, I sat there in a humble black windbreaker and played let's pretend.  It would have to do.




             We returned to the hotel for a short rest and had our dinner in a pizzeria across the canal from the hotel entrance.

Venice, November 12, Tuesday


            Today was devoted to a summary tour of the Biennale.  I have lost track of how many Biennales we have attended over the years, but the number is between eight and ten. 


            The Liassidi Palace, being easterly of San Marco Square, was a good place to start our walk to the exhibition areas, the Arsenale and the Giardini.  The sunshine was brilliant, and the temperature about 70 degrees.  It was a fifteen-minute walk to the Arsenale, formerly a rope factory for the Venetian navy, a rambling structure perhaps 500 yards in length with numerous large rooms and twenty-five foot ceilings.  We arrived before 10 a.m. and had to stand in line at the ticket booths, but at least the exhibition authorities allowed a senior discount, and so we entered for about fifteen euro each, perhaps twenty.  While standing in line we met a young friend we had known in Berlin, Valerie Chartrain, formerly an assistant director of the Neugerriemschneider Gallery.  We continued to meet up with Valerie, who is very knowledgeable about the current art scene, during the day, and that proved to be a good opportunity to exchange remarks about the artworks and the tenor of the show.

Past Biennales were informative and enjoyable for the most part, but our appreciation has declined over the last three or four as we have perceived that the objectives of the chief curators selected for each Biennale have changed. 

            The principal changes had to do with worldwide inclusion.   If in our perception this trend coincides with a diminution of the influence of a rigorous, Western, intellectual perspective, so be it.   The curatorial aim of the immediately preceding exhibitions appeared to us to be to include as many artists with unpronounceable names from as many countries with unpronounceable names as possible.  This is difficult for simple minds like my own.  I draw a line from Egypt/Mesopotamia through Crete, Greece, Rome, Western Europe and New York to California and call that the canon.   I have grudgingly learned that there have been some pretty good artists from Japan, Korea and China, and I have seen some fine rugs from Persia, India and Central Asia, but apart from that, forget it.  

            The art theoretician Rosalind Krauss several years ago penned an essay entitled “The Death of the Avant Garde.”  Since for me art must have a conceptual as well as esthetic basis, I resisted the notion of this extinction, but this year’s Biennale, entitled “Il Palazzo Enciclopedico/The Encyclopedic Palace,” appeared to us to have been staged as a proof of concept.  It dawned on us slowly that the very title of the Biennale was the clue that all manner of stuff, up to and including figurative kitchen sinks, had been installed on the floors and walls of what had for years been known as the Italian Pavilion. 

As we walked through the galleries, we saw that feeling and mysticism utterly had crowded out what for several decades had been the purpose of thoughtful Western art, namely, a rational and analytical depiction in esthetic terms of the changing world about us.  The chief Curator, Massimiliano Gioni, who is a staff curator at the New Museum in New York, chose most of the work displayed in the central locations.  We came to Venice because of bright predictions before the show opened that we would see something different this year.  That proved to be true all too painfully.  Gioni didn’t just challenge what had prevailed as the heritage of the avant-garde, he negated it.  Gioni is highly knowledgeable, but he’s a lightweight chasing a denominator so broad as to render discrimination almost impossible.


We saw artworks by unknowns dealing with the ordinary problems and perceptions of ordinary, unsophisticated people and appealing to a like audience.  I found myself somewhere between the normal fare on commercial television today and the art that was exhibited at the Indiana State Fair in the 1940’s.  There was interesting stuff (Christopher Williams is a favorite of ours) and some imaginative “outsider art,” but most of what was included was dumb production by people under-educated according to today’s deplorable standards.  The strong tendency toward the mystical – I thought we had gotten that out of our systems in this era with the Pre-Raphaelites – drove me up the walls.  You can read a theoretical summary of our reactions in an article that Benjamin Buchloh, a Harvard professor, wrote in a review of the Biennale in “Artforum” earlier this year.  Gioni managed to refute the whole progression of modern art from David and Delacroix through the Impressionists, Matisse and Picasso, German expressionism, dada, Surrealism, Vito Acconci, Serra and Naumann and replace it with Grandma Moses (nothing against Grandma Moses, in its place).  Gioni tried to say that Dieter Roth is on the side of the amateur mystics, but I am not buying it.   Gioni might have included the late Mark Rothko in the show if he could have, but I said goodbye to Rothko long ago.




            The brilliant Jeremy Deller had a folksy show in the British pavilion, which we deemed OK because it was smart, and we liked the presentation of Ai Wei Wei, who for some reason was allowed to represent Germany.  He did something interesting but opaque: a large room filled and stacked with wooden chairs, hooked together chair leg to chair top seemingly randomly, up to the ceiling.  The coveted Dare and Themis prize went to the U.S. pavilion, which housed several installations by the brilliant and impeccable young American artist, Sarah Sze.  On first impression the artist’s work, which consists, briefly put, of sprawling installations of tiny, common objects held together with fine wires that give the impression of helter-skelter confusion, seems to be about the chaos of the world around us.  It is, but it is organized and controlled by a shrewd intelligence and an unimpeachable esthetic sense.  The work is delicate and feminine.  The State Department solicits professional views on which American artist should be shown in the U.S. Pavilion every two years.  We have disapproved of many American pavilions in the past, some because they appeared intentionally to portray American culture as weak, insincere and insipid, but this year’s exhibition was a home run.


            We were exhausted at the end of the day.   On the way out, we eschewed a stop at what had been a somewhat dilapidated, comfortable and rusty coffee and pastry room covered with a grape arbor at the exit to the Giardini near the lagoon because the place had been remodeled into a shiny new bar and pastry shop, no doubt with prices to match.  So our traditional place of saying farewell to the Biennale has been taken from us.   Accordingly, we present you with the scorn of older folks who are continually being priced out of formerly attainable markets.  The world belongs to the young – or the tourists from Russia.

            We walked slowly nearly a mile back to the hotel and lay down for a short, somewhat illicit rest (when traveling with Dare, every rest is somehow illicit).  Magically a text message from Valerie appeared on my iPhone:  would we join her for dinner at a hot restaurant recommended by the young international art mafia somewhere near the Rialto Bridge?  Youngsters don’t have to ask older people twice, so of course we accepted and immediately feigned reinvigoration.  We made our way on to the vaporetto at San Zaccaria, and then the exchange of text messages began.  The first restaurant proved to be a dud said Valerie, but, not to worry, we have a new bar and restaurant on the main street going east, or so we assumed, off the Rialto Bridge.  We got off at the Rialto, but how we finally found the place, off the street and into a small campo about 200 dark yards from the bridge, I will never know.  In the end, we had a good drink (I drink nothing but Compari in Italy) and a very good dinner on a crowded mezzanine floor of an ancient brick building with five tables.  The art mafia had come through.

            There was a short thought of walking back to the hotel through San Marco Square, but sanity prevailed, and we took the Number 1 vaporetto.  That hits every stop and takes about 20 or 25 minutes to get back to where we started.  For some reason the former express Grand Canal vaporetto has been discontinued, possibly since our last visit in November of 2011, but my memory is no longer reliable in these matters.

Venice, November 13, Wednesday

            One gauges the quality of a hotel in great measure by the appearance of the clientele at breakfast, and the persons in the Liassidi Palace breakfast area did not disappoint.

            After breakfast we sought out the Scuola Dalmata delli Santi Giorgio e Triffon, also known as Scuola di San Giorgio degli Schiavoni, which is quite near the Liassidi Palace and the Greek Orthodox church of St. George.  This marvelous Scuola, or home of a confraternity, is much smaller, say, than San Rocco, but its ground floor in particular is graced on all four walls by masterpiece wall paintings by Vittore Carpaccio.  Carpaccio came from the Dalmatian coast, and his paintings show an “oriental influence.”  These illustrations from the traditional life of St. George are stunning in every respect, and we owe the visit to the diligence of our son, George, who saw the Scuola when we were together in Venice in November of 2011. 



Afterwards we walked into Piazza San Marco and then took a sharp turn away from the square going north at a right angle and ended up in streets with one shop after another selling good quality and interesting wares.  As we neared the Rialto district, Dare made two stops, the first to buy a handsome pair of Prada sunglasses and the second to buy a pair of mid-ankle-high shoes from Max Mara.  I was just people watching.  We crossed the Rialto Bridge and walked past the campo where we had dined the evening before, wondering anew how we could possibly have found the place in the dark.  Most Venice narrow streets off a few main routes are hardly lit at night.  We thought about lunch at Ala Madonna, a notorious but wonderful tourist-trap restaurant, but it was closed.  We had a quick, as usual overpriced lunch along the Grand Canal near the Rialto Bridge and then took the vaporetto back to the hotel.

But not so fast.  We had purchased 24-hour vaporetto tickets the evening before for the highway robbery price of 20 euro per ticket.  On the way back to the hotel at about two in the afternoon, the valid ticket patrol descended on our boat of all the boats on the canal, and a young female functionary examined our tickets.  Dare had seen her stop a native passenger a few moments before, so she was not targeting tourists.  She announced, regretfully, that we had failed to have our tickets stamped at a vaporetto station entrance – the only way to start the 24-hour validity running – and now we owed a fine totaling 59 euro, in my humble a staggering sum for such a trifling offense.  But then we were tourists, and in any event there was no appeal.  We paid in cash quietly and tried to pretend nothing had happened.



We checked out, dragged the bags over only one bridge to Sant Zaccaria and caught the boat shuttle for another tedious one hour ride (there is no WC aboard) to the airport.   We boarded our 16:50 Alitalia flight without incident and barely an hour later touched down in Rome.

The ride into the old City and our hotel, the Adriano for our fourth stay, was without incident except for our being struck with how vast Rome, a city of nearly five million, is.  95% of the City has nothing to do with the ancient monuments and churches that we come to see.  It’s huge, and it’s modern.  Traffic whizzes by on broad multi-laned boulevards.  After twenty minutes or so of disorientation I recognized the dark-brick outlines of the Terma di Carracala.   A few minutes later we passed the white wedding-cake Victor Emmanuel monument, drove north on a street parallel with the Corso and two blocks to the east of it, and finally cut west toward the Piazza Navona to Via Pallacorda 2.  We changed clothes, had a decent pasta meal at Sugo, a restaurant just north of the Pantheon, stopped at what we have considered for years as the world’s best gelato dispensary and then turned in for the night.

Rome, November 14, Thursday

            At last, the moment I had been awaiting for two years arrived:  the morning Cappuccino at the famed coffee house, Tazza d’Oro.  Reigning supreme among small antique and fine goods stores a few yards from the Pantheon, Tazza d’Oro features a large coffee grinder, gleaming vitrines filled with packaged coffees and delicacies and a long, curved, copper bar serving the best coffee I have ever tasted.  It may be rivaled by the Sant’Eustachio coffee shop (see the summary of Sunday, November 17, below).  I think the foam topping on the cappuccino is a bit looser and fluffier than in past years, when it seemed to be a thin layer of solid cream that one’s spoon had to dig through, but that drink is still my dream.  If I had managed my life better, I would have spent most of my life within walking distance of Tazza d’Oro.

            We walked east to the Corso, past a high level men’s store, Vatari, showing beautifully knitted sweaters in the windows.  The interior of the store was all polished oak, and the salesmen were suitably arch and uncaring.  Against all sense, common and otherwise, I had to have one of their sweaters, even though I wear a sweater only about 20 times a year and was carrying a nice one by Yamamoto in my luggage.  O well, a sweater from a fine Rome shop is, obvious to me at any rate, on a whole different level of being.   I’ll let you know how well it fits and how well I like it sometime next February.

            The first stop on our Roman tour was the museum of the Villa Pamphilij, an astonishing collection of mostly smaller paintings, many by Caravaggio, and a lot of furniture and stuff.  Look it up.  The museum hosts the portrait of Pope Innocent X by Velazquez (1650).  I peered and peered at the Pope for an aggregate of 12 minutes.  In my book Velasquez is the greatest painter who ever lived, and this portrait is the best portrait ever painted by anyone anytime.  Standing awe-struck before the portrait is highly recommended any chance you get.  Innocent is shown with the sophistication of a great statesman, banker and leader, and as someone no one in his right mind would mess with, while at the same time being entirely at home in his authoritative ecclesiastical robes.  Before leaving the museum, I paused reverentially at the small bronze sculpture of a muscular centaur in the last room, a superb work embodying everything you always wanted to experience of sexual misconduct.  Nobody ever accused Romans of abjuring sensuality.


            We continued down the Corso, crossing to the left side just before reaching the Victor Emmanuel Monument.  We found a bank machine and crossed the complex intersection of busy, wide streets, aided by the precise signals of the immaculately clad (navy blue, white and gold braid) traffic policemen, surely the exemplar for the traffic controllers of the world.  We spent a lot of time strolling leisurely through the reconstructed ruins of Trajan’s Forum.  It was terrific.  As a matter of fact, all of the antiquities in Rome appeared to us recently to have been cleaned and refurbished.  We had always looked at that Forum from across the road, but had never explored the area.

            By this time we had sucked it up and implemented the Roman practice for crossing streets at marked crosswalks that had no traffic lights.  At a point determined by instinct and a rough canvas of the velocity and density of the oncoming autos, one simply steps resolutely into the crosswalk, holding one’s breath hoping that others who have been waiting on the curb will join him, and presto!  Oncoming traffic slows or stops to accommodate the pedestrians.  It’s not intuitive to a San Franciscan, but it works.  It beats crossing a wide street in Cairo, where there are no marked crosswalks, and the traffic proceeds slowly but never stops for a pedestrian.  It’s every man for himself as you dodge and weave between the cars, lane by lane.


            We had lunch under a shady grape arbor of a very nice outdoor trattoria at the far end of Trajan’s Forum, Angelina ai Fori, for all of euro 21.50.  We then crossed the broad Via dei Fori Imperiale and entered the principal Roman Forum at about 1:30.  The tourists were moderate in number.   We were enjoying t-shirt weather and sparkling sunlight.  We couldn’t find the entrance to the Church of Santi Cosma and Damiano to see the mosaics in the apse of the rivers of creation, but we had been there before, we were still slightly jet-lagged and the atmosphere was too felicitous to care.  We did the circuit around the Arch of Titus, noting that a long drought in that part of Italy had begun to ameliorate, and the patches of grass throughout the ruins were a bright, bright green amidst the shiny wet red clay and rocks.  Our lassitude dictated that we skip the ruins and museum on the adjacent Palatine Hill to the south of the Forum – the guilt lasted about 30 seconds - and we walked directly up the Capitoline Hill to the Campidoglio, where Marcus Aurelius was at his old post on horseback and we could admire the Michelangelo buildings and stairs.  After that we rested, and might have dozed off, for a few minutes in the marvelous rectangular yet baroque Santa Maria d’ Aracoeli church.  We stopped again outside the entrance, which sits atop 124 steps—"the grandest loafing place of mankind," as Henry James put it.  This is the spot on which Gibbon was inspired to write his great history of the decline and fall of the Roman empire while listening to vespers one winter’s eve as daylight faded.   I decided I could spend many days loafing there, provided I could start those days at Tazza d’Oro.

            The touring day ended with a walk up the crowded Corso to the sweater shop, where I picked up my bundle, whereupon we continued north a half mile and found the Rome branch of Dare’s favorite ladies store, Custo of Barcelona.  It’s colorful, it’s hip and it carries a flavor of Barcelona and its singular designs.  We spent an eternity in that shop, shopping for a Christmas present for Dare’s sister Suzanne and for Dare herself.   After that it was the Adriano for a short nap.

            The nap did it.  After hitching up our belts and pulling up our socks, we essayed that all we had to do is walk south past the Pantheon and, with a wiggle here and a waggle there – which probably makes no sense if you don’t know the old part of Rome – we might stumble on to the Campo di Fiore and dine at La Carbonara, an old place we had enjoyed on prior visits.  We arrived at the late evening bustle of the large square of Largo di Torre Argentina (where Julius Caesar was assassinated) and turned right (Google and Apple Maps on the iPhone were of virtually no help), but not far enough.  Following a trail I dimly remembered we headed further south and found ourselves in the Ghetto, exactly at the location of the loft we had rented in November of 2011.  We knew there was a famous restaurant there and scrabbled around in the dark in the general area of the Portico d’Ottavia, when there it was right in front of us, the famous Giggetto Restaurant.  Unfortunately we were early for a Rome dinner.  We didn’t manage to see the main dining room on the way in and ended up in a barren, unpeopled side room.   We were not dressed up, so it was just as well.  Dare braved an order of Jerusalem style fried artichoke.  I couldn’t do it and settled instead for a fried flower.  Then came a tender boneless pork cutlet, which we ate plain with three thin slices of sautéed potato, forgetting that in Italy nothing comes with anything.  If you want a vegetable you have to order it.  On the way out we passed through the main dining room and at last saw what the fuss was all about.  This was a clientele delivered to the door by limousine and taxi.  The atmosphere was gay and important.  I always find the Ghetto area a bit depressing, like a mild hangover.  Apparently the middle-aged and young have no problem partying there.  More power to them.

            After dinner, we walked into the Adriano to find a roaring party in progress.  The guests, probably 150 in all in five small interconnecting rooms of the “lobby,” which in any event is more like the salons of a rambling home, all looked agreeably affluent and fashionable.  Indeed, some of the ladies were downright seductive and all of them might have walked off a fashion-show runway and into the party.  We had to ask what was going on, whereupon an obliging, attractive lady of 40 or so said that this was a party hosting judges of the central Roman courts, albeit perhaps a quarter of the total number of courts in the Roman judicial district, the largest in Italy.   Whatever the quality of the jurists’ deliberations and jurisprudential acumen, they certainly were a good-looking bunch.  I didn’t have the nerve, but as the party was waning Dare presented herself at the open bar and came away with a champagne cocktail.  Dare carries herself with a certain air to be sure, but this is probably the first time anyone has taken her for a judge. After our binge of people watching of noble Romans, we retired to our chambers.

Rome, November 15, Friday

            Today was St. Peter’s and Vatican day.  We took a taxi to the main entrance of they Musei Vaticani and got in easily with no advance tickets.  We did the long trek through an unfamiliar route – I swear the Vatican administration must change the route every two years just to confuse tourists – but soon we were in the Raphael Stanze and gawking at Plato and Aristotle walking in great dignity toward us and at the marvelous Madonnas.  Now they make you walk through the modern religious art section, a tedious affair except for a Fontana or Matisse or so, before you can enter the Sistine Chapel.  It was probably 11 a.m. and the Chapel was still full of people but not crushingly so as in other seasons.   Of course the art is uplifting, and there is no question that the cleaning of several years ago, controversial at the time, was extremely helpful to visitors.  Adam, the prophets and the sybils retain their majesty.

        

         We stopped along the long walk around the exterior walls of the Vatican City for a quick lunch.  It was raining lightly.  St. Peter’s Square was not crowded.  Most visitors were huddled under the Bernini portico.  We soon learned that St. Peter’s would be closed until 3 p.m. and would then open for the consecration of the new bishop of the surrounding diocese.  We hung around in the rain and finally saw lines forming for entrance into the basilica.  



Dare feigned disorientation, something she does with great facility, and we were able to join the line magically at about the 10 percent from the entrance point.  We got in after a long bout of standing, only to learn that the Michelangelo Pieta was closed off to visitors.  Joining the crowd forming around the main nave, we stood for another tiring half hour or so waiting for the service to begin.  I couldn’t stand the wait, or rather my feet couldn’t, and so we bailed before the start.  Only later did we learn to our shock and dismay that we had missed an opportunity to stand within 60 feet or so from where Pope Francis, who a few minutes later officiated at the consecration, would walk to the Baldacchino.  This was the first of the many things we were to commit or suffer during this trip.  We were heartbroken.






            We took a cab back to the Adriano.  The evening was routine, with dinner at a pizzeria called Ciro & Ciro between the Adriano and the Pantheon.

Rome, November 16, 2013, Saturday

            Another grand and warm morning in Rome.   Immediately as we left the Adriano my mind wandered and, almost impossibly, we lost the street heading down to the Pantheon and Tazza d’Oro and found ourselves walking east the few hundred yards to the Corso.  We turned right and then left, or east, on to a wide lane that leads to the Fountain of Trevi.  That immediately recalled a fiasco we endured during an April week ten years ago when we thought it would be convenient to rent an apartment across the street from the Fountain, only to find that hundreds of raucous students remained in the Piazza under our windows until two or three a.m. every evening.  Once at the fountain I went into my Russ Tamblyn/Frank Sinatra act from the movie and insisted that a skeptical Dare do the same, namely, inch our way through the mob to the edge of the water and throw a coin into the fountain over our shoulders.  Reassured, we took a long look at the international tourist horde and proceeded body by body to a white and chrome, adequate espresso bar for our morning coffee.


            After coffee we climbed the Quirinal to the south and stopped at the top of the hill at the Palace to view the smartly clad guards and a few inevitable celebrities leaving in limousines and then crossed the street to one of my five favorite churches, Sant’ Andrea al Quirinale by Bernini.  This is the high baroque church with the greenish and white interior, the nave of which is an oval entered from the center of a long side of the oval.  Normally the interior I stunning, but on this day all was covered by scaffolding, and the ceiling paintings were invisible.  The adjoining parks were also closed for repairs, but on the corner, la Chiesa di San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane, another small baroque gem by Borromini, was open and intact.


            We walked through the Piazza Barberini, where I stopped at the Farmacia Internazionale to buy shaving cream, and Dare stopped to buy an improbable Greta Garbo floppy brimmed hat in purple, soft, faux-velvet from a street vendor.  We walked to the top of the Spanish steps.  Never having had the privilege of staying at the Hassler (all these names are now hyphenated with the names of the remote hotel chains that now own them, but no matter) Dare predictably took the opportunity to pose in her new felt hat.


            Descending the steps we were pleased to find very few tourists scattered about but dismayed to find a large, oval shaped, walled area at the base of the steps covered with illustrations of the wonders of Samsung products.   We walked about the Piazza de Spagna and then back to the Corso along the wondrous Via Condotti and the international throngs of chic shoppers enjoying the window displays.
Civitavecchia and the time to board the Nautica was nearing.  We settled our bill, and the desk summoned a cab that took us through the twisting streets for about half an hour to the Mussolini era Stazione Termini.  Several days later a store keeper near the hotel told us that this station had become a “favella,” but we didn’t have an inkling of that until the cab had to fight its way through triple-stacked cars to find a spot to let us off.  If you’ve ever tried to emerge from a cab at the 7th Avenue entrance to Penn Station, remember that feeling and double it.                     

            Once inside we found ourselves in a jammed rabbit warren, not even a ticket counter or travel center in sight.  I left Dare with the bags and wandered about seventy feet to a newsstand to ask where I could buy tickets to Civitavecchia, where the Nautica had presumably docked that morning.  The biglietteria, usually lit up with glaring neon, was nowhere to be found, so I asked at a nearby newsstand.   The guy there said he could sell me the tickets for five euro each.  I blinked and gave him the slyest look I could muster to let him know that I was well versed in the wiles of the Italians, but he said, “No, really.”  So I handed over the five-euro note and came away with two official slips of green faux-engraved paper.  Now to find the binario (track) from whence the promised train would leave.  The universally used big, miniscule font, yellow timetable on the wall said the train for Civitavecchia would leave at 3:15 from Track 27, but the overhead electronic standard said no track was assigned.  We waited until 15 minutes before train time to see Track 27 confirmed and shot off like thunderbolts. 

What we didn’t know was that Track 27 was about a quarter of a mile away and required an obscure elevator ride for one floor down to get there.   Worse, about 120 pounds of baggage had to be dragged at an uphill angle on ramps a good part of the way, and Dare was pulling about 70 pounds’ worth.  About four minutes from departure time, as we were huffing and puffing, a stalwart Libyan-looking youth came to our rescue and grabbed Dare’s heaviest bag to assist us.  Foolishly, I took him to be a passenger.  He forged ahead with us, breathless in pursuit, and there was the train, still waiting.  It dawned on me, albeit tardily, that it was strange that our new helper was passing the first open doors to proceed another 150 yards to another door of the train where no one was waiting.  Then began a minuet between our new friend and Dare when they were caught between closing doors between two cars.  At last we stowed our luggage.  I tipped the young man 10 euros for his kind help, and he dashed off.  Two minutes later Dare looked down to see that her purse was gone (wallet, passport and iPhone).  The young man had reached into the open bag Dare was carrying and swiped her iPad mini as well.  Needless to saw, the shroud of gloom, doom and foolishness descended on both of us.

We proceeded on the train to Civitaveccia.  I e-mailed George asking him to get on the web to cancel Dare’s iPhone and the American Express from Citibank.  I called the Bank of America emergency line, probably at a cost of $25 or so given the security rigamarole required, and after the third hold-the-line referral, managed to cancel Dare’s ATM card.  I then had to call Citibank with similar effect to cancel the American Express card.   My Frankfurt banker would not answer her cell phone, so the Mastercard could not be canceled.   Finally, we arrived at the station and hailed a cab that took us to the Nautica.

We boarded the ship to the most glad-handed yet sincere greetings imaginable from our new best friend, Carlos Cortez, the ship’s concierge, and were about to be shown to our stateroom when the news came that we would have to leave the ship.  An improbably tanned and long-legged lady in a white officer’s uniform arrived to announce that Dare would not be allowed to leave Italy without a valid passport.   Crestfallen, we disembarked as instructed and caught a ride on the ship’s shuttle bus to what we were told would be a spot three hundred yards from the station.   It turned out to be a thousand yards and entailed considerable dragging of our bags over rough pavement in irritated, sullen and downcast mode.  It was a long train ride back to the Stazione Termine, an interminable trek from Track 27 to the exit and then a confrontation with surly taxi drivers, all in the midst of the maelstrom of bodies in and outside the station, who demanded 40 euros for what had earlier in the day been a fifteen euro ride from the Adriano to the station.  We settled for 30 and were back at the hotel, which generously gave us a spacious, modern room at an excellent rate.

Then came the fun.   Certain that we needed a police report (as had been the case in Naples 22 years ago) to obtain a new passport, we twisted and turned through the dark lanes of the Old City until we found the office of the Carabonieri which fortuitously happened to be in the Piazza San Lorenzo.   The young but tired desk sergeant dutifully gave us the form, later accepted it and returned it with the official seals.  Hustling down the long staircase from the policeman’s office we found an excellent outdoor restaurant in the piazza, Caffe’ Vitti, and treated ourselves to an outstanding seafood risotto.  Finally, the day ended as well as it had begun.




Rome, November 17, 2013, Sunday

The day dawned bright and sunny, and we put the preceding day’s misfortunes behind us rather easily.   To vary the routine, we decided to go for our morning coffee to the second but co-equal temple of the coffee gods, Sant’Eustachio, just around the corner from the Pantheon.  The crowd had already gathered.   We were served our cappuccinos dry (you can ask the barista to have sugar mixed with the coffee during their mysterious espresso extrusion process, but the staff frowns on letting the customer add sugar on his own to his taste, that taste being assumed by the staff to be non-existent), and I had to ask three times for sugar when the barista pretended not to hear me the first two times.  Dare declared that she could taste more coffee in her drink than in a cappuccino from Tazza d’Oro.  I countered that my divine revelations on the matter indicated the contrary, but I wisely dropped the argument.

The next stop was the exterior and then the spacious Renaissance interior courtyard of the church of Saint Ivo Alla Sapienza.  The church is part of an old university building and features massive, almost white stone columns that seem to float despite their mass.  We then wandered westerly to the Piazza Navona, the highlight of every visit.  This time we were rewarded by the relatively low tourist density but were set back a bit by what appears to us to have become the routine of the square.  The stationary “art” figures and the musicians have become pervasive, and the music acts have become noisy.  The Piazza’s act is getting old.


Turning south we crossed the Campo di Fiore in sight of a long-time favorite restaurant of ours, La Carbonara, which we were not able to visit on this trip.




A few steps further south and we were standing before my favorite example of fine architecture, the Palazzo Farnese by Michelangelo.  We stared in silence from the entrance to the piazza and we sat under the wall of the building for about fifteen minutes.  Rounding the building, we walked perhaps two hundred yards along the beautiful Via Giulia and then found the Ponte Mazzini to cross the Tiber over to Trastevere.



Trastevere has its own feeling, perhaps something to do with the width of the streets, which are slightly wider than the streets of Old Rome just across the river.  The sun was still bright, and we didn’t mind the concentration of tourists as we arrived in the main square.  We found a good place for lunch on a narrow lane off the square, Ristorante la Canonica, and then paid our respects to the mosaics of the basilica of Santa Maria in Trastevere. 



We walked back to the river and walked south along the bank until we could cross into the Isola Tiberina, the scenic island in the river, where we wanted to enter one of my favorites (they’re all my favorites), the church of San Bartolomeo all’ Isola, which has that three foot stump of an ancient altar fashioned from an ancient column in the front of the nave where the steps lead to the main altar.   That little relic blows me away every time.  Alas, it was about two o’clock, and the church was closed until three.  We chose not to wait.

Crossing the second bridge to the Old City, we passed the massive Synagogue, which still requires guards at the entrance, and moved into the main street of the ghetto at the Giggetto al Portico d’Ottavia restaurant.  The outdoor café area of the restaurant was overflowing with well-heeled revelers.  The entire ghetto area was jammed with jovial folks enjoying the outdoor cafes on this warm, 70-degree afternoon.   We understand that very few Jews now live in the ghetto, but on weekends many come into the ghetto from the surrounding suburbs to socialize and eat the classic fried artichokes. 

Leaving the ghetto to the north, we found a shop where Dare had bought a long, knitted sweater two years before, and this time she bought another one at a ridiculously low price.   It would come in in handy in the evening when the weather would cool substantially.  We walked for an hour through new territory for us back to the Pantheon and once again past the San’tEustachio coffee house, which at about 4:30 p.m. had a long line of coffee addicts waiting to enter.  Dare bought a new wallet at a shop near the gelato palace just north of the Pantheon.  Dinner was once again at the Caffe’ Vitti, which we had come to like very much.

This had been a classic Rome walking day.  We loved it.

Rome, November 18, 2013, Monday

            Just as the morning broke, it dawned on us that Dare needed a new passport or we wouldn’t be going anywhere.  The U.S. Embassy was scheduled to open at 8:30 a.m., so it was the required cappuccinos at Tazza d’Oro and then a taxi ride cross town to the fabled Via Veneto and the spacious and gracious Embassy buildings.  The late 19th century buildings stand as two palazzi, the main one being the Palazzo Margherita (1886-1890), at the first bend of the Via, just before the Hotel Exelsior, itself an architectural marvel.  The State Department purchased the buildings in 1931, and to me they have always been a goodly part of the center of the Roman chessboard.

            We were politely requested to navigate fairly strict security procedures before entering the building housing the Consulate.   Dare sat for a photo portrait by one of those four euros in the slot carnival camera machines, then went upstairs and took a number as in a bakery, filled out her application and waited.  I left for greener pastures, namely, a walk up the Veneto for three blocks or so, highlighted by a stop in the informal coffee bar of Downey’s, which since at least the fifties, and no doubt well before then, has been a prestige café-restaurant of Rome and a watering hole for celebrities.  It was before 10 a.m., and no celebrities were about – was I really expecting Anita Ekberg to appear? – so I effected as much casual repose as it is possible for this American to muster and, leaning on the bar and teasing my second cappuccino of the morning, read my email on my iPhone while a few regulars with briefcases got their morning gossip out of the way.  I measured personal success by the fact that I was accepted as part of the furniture.

            I walked back to the Embassy, and some minutes after eleven Dare triumphantly burst on to the sidewalk, new passport in hand.  In another in a string of poor decisions so far on this trip, we concluded that this would be the morning to visit the Borghese Gallery.  We had a lovely walk through the park, but found the Gallery to be closed.  Of course.  It was Monday, and why hadn’t we thought of that?  We hopped on to one of those small buses that circle the city and got back to the Via Veneto.  The next decision was a bit more on the mark.  We decided it was too far to walk, so we took a cab to Santa Maria Maggiore.  The church never disappoints, although by then a cloud cover made it rather difficult to view the mosaics.  We decided to pass on the Bernini staircase, since that was a separate admission, and walked across the street to a lunch spot.

            For the third consecutive visit to Rome we arrived at the praiseworthy church of Santa Pudenziana, couple of blocks downhill from Santa Maria Maggiore, only to find it closed.





  Nothing to do but turn back to the busy Via Cavour and headdownhill toward the Forum to the church of San Pietro in Vincolo (requires stair-climbing to get up there) to see the great Michelangelo sculpture of Moses.  The face of the statue has his head turned at 90 degrees, his magnificent eyes hooded and empty, as though Moses can see the Promised Land before he has arrived there.  How Michelangelo attained that look in Moses’ eyes in marble has to be one of the mysteries for the ages.  Alas, our losing streak continued because we arrived a full hour before the church was to open to the public at three p.m.


            So.   After absorbing this setback in our by now sorry record of careless touring, by this time having achieved virtual Tom and Daisy status, we continued to walk downhill toward the Victor Emmanuel Monument but took a left which took us to another heart-in-your-mouth series of crosswalks across the Via Fori Imperiale to the area between the end of the Forum and the Coliseum, which, by the way, appears to be undergoing extensive renovation.   We walked among the many tourists and vendors to the Arch of Constantine, like most of the world’s serious monuments now closed off to the public.  Then commenced a vey long walk south to the edge of the Terme de Caracalla and then took a sharp turn to the northwest.  That allowed us to discover – we had never done this before – just how large the Circus Maximus is. 

As we hit the main drag we discovered that we were a few yards from Santa Maria in Cosmedin, site of the huge gorgon, or whatever he or she is, with the huge, forbidding mouth that Gregory Peck stuck his hand into while Audrey Hepburn delicately gasped in horror in the timeless “Vacanza Romana.”  Fat chance of repeating that ritual, which my son George and I had last accomplished in 2003 (I have a miniature gorgon head on my bathroom countertop), because about 150 Japanese students were in line to photograph themselves risking their delicate hands in what the signs proclaimed to be “the mouth of danger.” 



The church was eminently unpopulated, however, so we were able to ooh and ah at the terrazzo floor and the 600 A.D. altar on the level below.  Then up the main drag, the Via del Teatro di Marcello, where we decided to visit an exhibition of the archaeological marvels of Saudi Arabia in an exhibition space under the Victor Emmanuel Monument that has an entrance at street level.  As we were later to confirm in Oman, the Arabs are now hiring western archaeologists and art exhibitors to polish up the image of their pre-historical sites.  The exhibition was excellent and highly informative in any event.

After that it remained to dodge the traffic in the Piazza Venezia and walk the mile or so back to the Adriano with a stop along the busy Corso for Dare to buy some lipstick.   It was time to contact Kaz in Istanbul and figure out how we were going to get out of Rome to where we could finally join the Nautica for our cruise.  We had telephoned Kaz earlier that morning from the Borghese Gardens, and now we learned that he had come through splendidly.   He had found a cheap flight to Izmir via Istanbul, and from there we could proceed to Kusadasi and begin our cruise.

At last we could enjoy dinner in our favorite Piazza San Lorenzo.   



 After dinner there was time for a last stroll along the Via Condotti.  Inevitably that meant a stop at the landmark coffee house, the Caffe’ Greco, within a stone’s throw across the Piazza di Spagna from the bottom of the Spanish steps.  This is the second oldest café in Italy, established in 1760 and second oldest only to the Caffe’ Florian we had visited in Venice, which was established in 1720.  Historic figures who took their coffee and pastries in this almost mythical venue included Stendhal, Goethe, Mariano Fortuny, Byron, Franz Liszt, Keats, Henrik Ibsen, Hans Christian Andersen, Felix Mendelssohn, Wagner, Carlo Levi and, reputedly, Casanova.



C’est moi at the Caffe’ above.  We arrived late, long after most of the day’s clientele had left for dinner, and closed the place down with extravagant orders of blueberry tart and rich hot chocolate.  Before leaving I scoured the walls of the six or seven rooms that make up the café looking among the pictures and engravings of café regulars for the English Romantics who lived in the area in the early 1800’s, but all I could find were pictures of bearded poets from the later 19th century who must have been prominent Italian literati in their time but, alas, were unknown to me.  If there had ever been pictures of Byron and Keats on the walls, they were long since taken down.  Like the Florian, the Caffe’ Greco is a fine spot for taking your tea while letting your imagination roam and, at the same time, gazing with wonder at the fine ladies who are shopping on the Via Condotti.


Rome, Istanbul, Izmir, Kusadasi, November 19, 2013, Tuesday

            It was our last morning in Rome, and it was showering on and off.  We decided to pass on a last hurrah at the Tazza d’Oro and headed instead east to the Corso and then turned north for the Piazza del Popolo, one of the great squares or open plazas of Rome.  We dodged pedestrians and cars, opening and closing our flimsy umbrellas, until we arrived at the opening of the Piazza and the two churches flanking the entrance, Santa Maria dei Miracoli and Santa Maria in Montesanto, one of which we were convinced on the basis of faltering memory harbored one or two of the greatest Caravaggios in the city.  Only Santa Maria in Montesanto was open (our luck was still bad) and, while handsomely decorated, featured no Caravaggio.  Of course not.  The paintings are in the nearby Basilica Parrocchiale S. Maria del Popolo, meaning our travels by guess, by golly and Kentucky windage and our luck were not improving.  There was nothing to be done in the drizzle but duck under the ample awnings of the Canova Café at last for the morning’s cappuccinos.  Even with the rain, the gray skies and very few people walking about, our rest in this magnificent open space was most pleasant.

            The next task was to find the Custo Barcelona store, which was on the way back to the hotel, because Dare had misplaced a “tax free” certificate, and we hoped that the store could issue a new one.  No luck, as Custo was closed, but as we walked away a downpour erupted, finding both of us with very urgent post-coffee needs and nowhere to go.  Further search would have meant a soaking, but just in time a café appeared for Dare and a space between two parked cars with no one looking on presented itself to me.  The rain stopped, and we enjoyed our last walk back to the Adriano through the Piazza San Lorenzo.

            The hotel checkout and cab ride out to Fiumicino were thankfully routine.  We located the Pegasus Airlines check-in counter in the farthest margin of the airport counters and were pleased to find the counter and the airline agents to be uncluttered and crisply efficient.  We were also pleased to note that a hushed conversation in Italian among the agents, which was most certainly about our bulging and overweight bags, produced no demand for additional payment.  We had a quick lunch at a typical airport snack bar.  We were soon in the air eastbound to the magic destination of Istanbul.  Three hours or so later we landed at the Sabiha Gokcen Airport on the Asian side (not the main Ataturk airport on the European side - this one is named after the first female fighter pilot of the Turkish Air Force) with a bit over an hour to spare before our connecting flight was scheduled to leave for Izmir, where the friendly limo that Kaz had arranged was to be waiting.  This may be an auxiliary airport, but it is huge.  At that point, the fun began.  Blood pressure and pulse rates were to remain well above normal for the next hour and a half.

            Obstacle one to a calm transfer was Immigration.  Almost 200 passengers were in line for admittance into Turkey.  It was hard somehow to adjust to the fact that we were entering Turkey at that point and then transferring to a domestic Pegasus flight.  Only two or three immigration officers were on duty, and by the time more were added more than a half hour had passed.  We somehow staggered to the vicinity of domestic gates, with no instructions from the local employees other than pointing ahead and then indicating a right turn to be had.  We thought we had a hundred yards to go but it proved to be more than 500 yards.  We passed through security and arrived breathlessly at the gate only to find that the Izmir flight had left five minutes ago and that the gate attendants were supremely unconcerned with our situation.  Some soul then appeared through the haze of our panic and told us that we would have to reverse our steps and return through the maze to the check-in counters and somehow find the Pegasus ticket sales counter to get new tickets.   That meant stops at three more counters, standing in line for six minutes (that seemed like 30), encountering blank, uncomprehending looks as we tried to explain that we desperately needed to get on to a later flight.  Finally at the third stop an angel of a lady ticket agent simply wrote out new tickets for the next flight leaving in about 45 minutes – without any extra charges.  We took the long hike back to the gate area – we struggled to remember the way - rested a bit at the gate and finally took off for the one hour fight south to Izmir.


            The last time I had been in the Izmir airport was June of 1955, when Izmir was barely larger than a combination minor port and fishing village, and no one in the airport administration thought it important to announce flights that were about to leave.  I know, because a young lady and I barely made a flight to Athens on a DC-4 that afternoon with 90 seconds to spare, after intuiting that the boarding was nearly finished and we had scampered across the tarmac.  The airport today is one of those behemoths, designed to impress passengers of the importance of the host city by making them walk over marble and granite for half a mile to the baggage carousels.  And then it dawned on us!  Our baggage had arrived on an earlier flight.   Could we possibly find our bags?  Up went our heart-rates again, particularly when we found that the baggage carousels where our bags logically would have been unloaded were now in a closed-off area.  Miraculously, a baggage agent understood the situation and let us in to the carousel that had been used for the flight we should have been on an hour before.   There to our amazement were our bloated and somewhat shabby bags, still circling on the rotating carousel in an enormous baggage claim room.  We grabbed our bags and made a dash for an exit that we prayed led to an exit from the terminal.  There within a hundred feet, to our amazed and grateful hearts, stood our driver, stolid and firm Turk that he was, still dutifully holding up a placard with our name on it.

 

            We had another distance to drag the bags into a very large parking structure, but soon we were on the road south in a roomy, yellow, four-wheeled vehicle, sometimes on the shore of the Aegean Sea and sometimes inland, although it was nearly midnight and there was almost no visibility.  In an hour we saw the lights of Kusadasi from the cliffs above.  The driver found our improbably luxurious resort hotel, the Korumar, and deposited us with the promise that he would return at 8:30 the next morning and take us to our ship.  We had almost forgotten that we were undergoing all of this for the purpose of finally commencing our cruise.

 

            We settled in our room, took a brief look from our balcony at the lights of the now-sprawling large port city below, nibbled at a couple of stale sandwiches left on a silver tray and collapsed for a night’s sleep.  We had come a long way in a day from our first cappuccino in far away Rome.